Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4024 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3210 - 380 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
380
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |