Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2378 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-3210 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7205 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |