Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3210 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3110M - 203 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$579.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$579.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M | vs | Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |