Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F and the cheaper Core i3-13100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$154.99 vs CA$270.73
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-13100 - 160 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
159
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$154.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-13100 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |