In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-12300 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-12300
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 99 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Jan 27, 2022 vs Nov 25, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 60 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
89 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
91%
Price, $
$870.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-12300
Jan 27th, 2022
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-12300 Jan 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
$143.00 | MSRP | $1,399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | TRX4 |
60W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
