In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-12100T is faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-12100T
- Up to 22% faster in Battlefield 6 – 93 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Jan 27, 2022 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
76 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
83%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-12100T
Jan 27th, 2022
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-12100T Jan 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | SP3r2 |
35W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
