Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 344 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$109.00 vs CA$409.00
- Up to 72% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-13700F - CA$0.74 vs CA$2.62 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-12100F - 156 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 378 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.62/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$409
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 377 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |