Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10320 - 253 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
253
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |