In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $311 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Up to 69% cheaper – $138.99 vs $449.98
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.80 vs $5.29/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
89%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
30%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2066 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
