Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Core i3-10105
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$142.99 vs CA$716.28
- Up to 76% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900KF - CA$1.08 vs CA$4.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105 - 160 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
133
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7662 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.48/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$716.28
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$716.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7662 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |