Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 315 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Core i3-10105
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105 - 236 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$109.00 vs CA$142.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.46 vs CA$0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$142.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7626 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7626 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |