Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$130.99 vs CA$279.98
- Up to 48% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.38 vs CA$0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10100 - 383 vs 349 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
349
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$130.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$279.98
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$279.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |