Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$103.99 vs CA$743.19
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.55 vs CA$3.08 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 28% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G6900 - 241 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7573 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
241
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.08/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$743.19
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$743.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7573 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |