Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 425 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$103.99 vs CA$499.00
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$0.54 vs CA$2.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - 203 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.46/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$499
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |