The Celeron G4900T is a faster gaming CPU than the FX-8350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G4900T
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900T vs FX-8350 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
168
99%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
100%
Celeron G4900T vs FX-8350 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900T vs FX-8350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900T vs FX-8350 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
