The Celeron G4900T is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3770K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G4900T
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-3770K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-3770K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
169
98%
Min 1% FPS
113
98%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
172
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, CA$
CA$350
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.03/FPS
100%
Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-3770K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $313.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
