The Celeron G4900T is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-11700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G4900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-11700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-11700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
169
84%
Min 1% FPS
113
85%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, CA$
CA$468.98
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.33/FPS
100%
Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-11700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-11700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-11700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-11700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $323.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |