In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G4900 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 3400G. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $54 cheaper!
Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper – $29.52 vs $83.13
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.48 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Apr 03, 2018
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 5 3400G: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
61 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
88%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.13
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
54W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
