Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$108.00 vs CA$119.35
- Up to 4% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$0.47 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G4900 - 244 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
229
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$119.35
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$119.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |