In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G4900 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-11900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $391 cheaper!
Celeron G4900
- Up to 93% cheaper – $29.52 vs $420.99
- Up to 93% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.48 vs $3.97/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 74% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 74% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 03, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G4900 vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
61 FPS
58%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
57%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
106 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.99
7%
Value, $/FPS
$3.97/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $539.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
