Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 1917 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 23% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G3930T - 190 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
