Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 12% better in God of War than Celeron G3930 - 184 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |