Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron G1850 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3170 days newer than Celeron G1850.
Advantages of Celeron G1850
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1850 - 565 vs 506 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1850 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7533 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1850 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |