Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron G1850 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2826 days newer than Celeron G1850.
Advantages of Celeron G1850
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 53 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1850 - 131 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1850 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1850 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |