Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3321 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 25% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1820 - 146 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |