Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3694 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 16% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1610T - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |