Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 33% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1610 - 206 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |