Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2500 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 241% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron B830 - 58 vs 17 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B830 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |