Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3839 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 36% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron B820 - 423 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B820 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |