Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3746 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 25% better in Ready or Not than Celeron B815 - 283 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
