Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2940 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 20% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 847 - 134 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |