Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3044 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 17 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 847 - 123 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$850
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$850 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |