Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4118 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron 847 - 328 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 20 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
