Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3791 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Remnant II than Celeron 847 - 99 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |