Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in Deathloop than Celeron 3865U - 202 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 32 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3865U | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |