In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3205U is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
34%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM5 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
