Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2591 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 3205U - 190 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
