Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3636 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Celeron 1007U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron 1007U - 458 vs 361 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1007U | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |