The Celeron 1000M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 7900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 2 threads
Celeron 1000M vs Ryzen 9 7900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Average FPS
164
75%
Min 1% FPS
111
78%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, CA$
CA$599.17
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.74/FPS
100%
Celeron 1000M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1000M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1000M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 1000M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
