The Celeron 1000M is a much slower gaming CPU than the FX-4300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron 1000M vs FX-4300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Average FPS
164
98%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron 1000M vs FX-4300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1000M vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1000M vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 1000M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
