Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 1050 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-9100F - 251 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
251
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
242
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |