Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 630 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 131 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - CA$619.35 vs CA$7560.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 150 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
110
83.96946564885496%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$7560
8%
Buy for CA$7,560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77029 minutes ago
Buy for CA$619.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
59.36106983655275%
Multi-Core
14828
91.40109720766813%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |