Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i5-10400F - 304 vs 301 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$114.99 vs CA$4967.05
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
304
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$4967.05
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$4,967.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
301
99.01315789473685%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$114.99
100%
Buy for CA$114.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
86.8882175226586%
Multi-Core
5751
39.44715001028877%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |