Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 3198 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-4100 - 117 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 99% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$31.73 vs CA$4967.05
- Up to 99% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$0.32 vs CA$42.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$42.45/FPS
0.7538280329799765%
Price, CA$
CA$4967.05
0%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$4,967.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
83.76068376068376%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |