Buy on Amazon
CA$1,800
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2871 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 14% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i5-3330 - 105 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 77 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
105
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor Without Cooler
Buy for CA$1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 77 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
