Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2633 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |