Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 881 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-8300 - 253 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 62 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
253
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1301
78.4207353827607%
Multi-Core
3825
35.71762069287515%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 62 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
