Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 75 days newer than Core i3-10300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10300 - 399 vs 386 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
386
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |