Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2821 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 70% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4300 - 399 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
235
58.89724310776943%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |