Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 79 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 110 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$45.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$4980
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$4,980 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |